Skip to main content Skip to footer

PROPERTY, RATES, AND CONSENTS

Other Building Supporting Documentation and Information

(Building Warrant of Fitness, Compliance Schedule, Notice to Fix, Certificate of Acceptance, Certificate of Public Use, Extension of Time, Swimming Pool, Earthquake-Prone Buildings)

 

Territorial Authority (TA)

As a Territorial Authority, the Council has further responsibilities for functions directly related to building under the Local Government Act and other relevant statutes.

Roles and Responsibilities of the TA

The roles and responsibilities of the Westland District Council as a Territorial Authority which are directly related to building control functions include the following:

  • Issuing project information memoranda, building consents subject to waivers or modifications, certificates of acceptance, compliance schedules and amendments, and certificates for public use;
  • Administering audits, and enforcing building warrants of fitness;
  • Undertaking functions in relation to dangerous, earthquake-prone and insanitary buildings; and
  • Determining exempt works under schedule 1 of the Building Act 2004.

The Compliance Officer can answer queries about Compliance Schedules and Building Warrants of Fitness for commercial and public buildings, unconsented building work and swimming pool safety. 

 

Granny Flats Exemption Guidance

Owners must meet all building consent exemption conditions. Otherwise, owners are required to get a building consent. Anything existing (built before) or building work already underway before 15 January 2026 is not eligible to be exempt from requiring a Building Consent.

Granny flats exemption: Guidance and resources | Building Performance

The Council retains its power to address non-compliant building work.

THE KEY CHANGE
From 15 January 2026, certain small standalone dwellings (commonly referred to as Granny Flats) can be built without requiring:
•    a building consent, and
•    a resource consent,
provided all statutory conditions are met.
 
This change is delivered through:
Amendments to the Building Act 2004
Building and Construction (Small Stand-alone Dwellings) Amendment Act 2025
Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Detached Minor Residential Units) Regulations 2025
 
WHAT YOU CAN DO
You can build a granny flat without a building consent and without a resource consent if all of the following apply:
 
1: Size Limit
•    The dwelling must be 70 square metres or less (gross floor area).


2: Standalone dwelling
•    It must be a new, standalone building.


3: Simple Design
•    The dwelling must be a simple design
•    It must fully comply with the Building Code


4: Licensed Professionals
•    All building work must be carried out or supervised by Licensed Building Practitioners
•    Restricted Building Works rules still apply


5: Council notification
•    Homeowners must notify the Council:
•    Before construction starts
•    Once construction is completed


6: Resource management compliance
•    The dwelling must comply with the National Environmental Standards for Detached Minor Residential Units (NES-DMRU), or any more permissive Council rules.


The exemption does not apply to:
•    Extensions,
•    Conversions,
•    Internal alterations to existing dwellings. 
If any one of these conditions is not met, the exemption does not apply.
 
WHAT YOU CANNOT DO
The new rules do not allow you to:
•    Build a dwelling larger than 70m² under the exemption.
•    Avoid Building Code Compliance.
•    Avoid engaging licensed professionals.
•    Ignore council processes altogether.
•    Assume development contributions no longer apply.
•    Ignore site-specific constraints (hazards, servicing, access, covenants).
•    Retrospectively legalise existing unconsented dwellings.
“No consent” does not mean “no regulation”.
 
WHAT STILL APPLIES
Even where the exemption is used:
•    Project Information Memorandum (PIM)
•    A Project Information Memorandum (PIM) remains a critical step.


Councils use the PIM to:
•    Identify site-specific constraints,
•    Confirm infrastructure servicing,
•    Levy development contributions.


Development contributions
•    Councils can still charge development contributions for granny flats.
•    These are issued via the PIM process.


Documentation and Records
•    Records of Work and design memoranda must still be completed and lodged.
•    Plumbing and drainlaying records remain mandatory.
•    Enforcement and liability
•    Councils retain enforcement powers for non-compliance.
•    Insurance and resale risks remain where documentation is incomplete.
 
WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT
Homeowners
•    Confirm the project qualifies for the exemption.
•    Notify council before and after construction.
•    Apply for a PIM.
•    Pay any applicable development contributions.


Designers and Builders
•    Ensure the design qualifies as “simple”.
•    Ensure full Building Code compliance.
•    Complete and lodge all required documentation.


Licensed Building Practitioners (LBPs)
•    Carry responsibility for restricted building work.
•    Complete Records of Design Work and Records of Building Work.
•    Clearly explain to clients what the exemption does — and does not — cover.
This reform shifts risk away from Councils and onto Professionals and Owners. It does not remove that risk.
 
OFFICIAL SOURCES AND LEGISLATION
Primary Legislation
Building and Construction (Small Stand-alone Dwellings) Amendment Act 2025
 
Building Consent Exemption Guidance
MBIE: Granny Flats Exemption – Guidance and Resources
 
MBIE Announcement
Ready, steady, go for Granny Flats (15 January 2026)
 
Ministerial statement
Granny flat consent exemption takes effect
 
LBP guidance
Upcoming changes: granny flats building consent exemption
 
Planning Framework
National Environmental Standards for Detached Minor Residential Units (NES-DMRU)
 
 
WHAT THIS MEANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION SECTOR AND THE PUBLIC
For the construction sector, this is a procedural reform, not deregulation. Consent processing has been reduced, but design discipline, documentation, and professional accountability increase.
 
For homeowners, the opportunity is real — particularly for:
•    Intergenerational Housing,
•    Rural and Staff Accommodation,
•    Small-scale Intensification.
However, misunderstanding the exemption carries real risk. Poor advice, incomplete documentation, or non-qualifying designs will surface later through insurance, finance, or resale.
 
THE BOTTOM LINE
This reform removes friction from the system — not responsibility.
 
Used correctly, it will:
•    Speed up delivery of small dwellings,
•    Reduce unnecessary consenting delay,
•    Support housing flexibility. 
Used incorrectly, it will simply shift risk from councils to owners and professionals.
 
As with all planning and building reform, the intent is sound. The outcome will depend on how well it is applied in practice.
 
More updates as implementation experience builds.

The Government's new 'granny flat' rules, which came into force on 15 January 2026, have been widely promoted as a win for property owners and housing supply.

Small standalone dwellings can now be built without some of the consents that previously applied, making it a simpler, low-cost process according to the narrative from Building Minister Chris Penk and Housing Minister Chris Bishop.

However, for property owners, the reality is far more complicated - and risky.

Rather than removing regulation the reforms effectively shift it. Where councils once checked compliance through formal consent processes, much of that responsibility - and risk - is now on homeowners themselves.

If you misunderstand the rules or miss a requirement, the consequences are no longer caught early. They arrive later, and they arrive expensively. This risk is also transferred in theory to the builder/designer with the safety net supposedly being implied warranties, builder's insurance and professional indemnity insurance.

The new pathway relies on exemptions under the Building Act and the National Environmental Standard for Detached Minor Residential Units (NES-DRMU). These exemptions are narrow and highly conditional. Councils still review applications through the Project Information Memorandum (PIM) process - but there is no formal approval. A PIM does not authorise construction. It simply provides information.

That matters. A PIM does not certify compliance or protect property owners from liability. It flags potential issues and leaves it to the applicant to identify, interpret and act on them correctly. Miss one, and the risk sits squarely with the property owner.

The issues commonly identified in a PIM are not minor technicalities. They can include building over boundaries, exposure to natural hazards, infrastructure requirements, development contributions, covenants or easements, and the need for resource consent under other national standards - such as contaminated land rules. Any one of these can derail a project or push it back into a full consent process after construction has already started.

The exemption does not apply to extensions, alterations or relocated buildings that existed before 15 January 2026. Assuming an older structure can be brought under the new rules is a compliance failure waiting to happen.

Even where a granny flat meets exemption criteria, the applicant needs to tick the building process regulations. All work must comply with the New Zealand Building Code and be carried out by Licensed Building Practitioners (LBPs). Work is deemed completed only when owners receive Certificates of Work, Records of Work from the LBPs, registered plumbers/drainlayers, and electrical and gas certification, and final design documentation.

From that point, strict timeframes apply. Applicants have 20 working days to pay the development contributions, if required.

Failure to get the documentation and pay the development contribution will trigger problems such as the lapsing of the PIM after 12 months from issue; likely enforcement after this point resulting in requirement to 'legalise' the work which may require lodging COA and /or building consent - costly, uncertain and stressful processes.

Long-term consequences can be even more troubling. Non-compliant buildings may create insurance problems, complicate financing, or surface years later during a property sale, when lawyers and valuers uncover missing documentation or regulatory breaches.

Granny flats can still be a valuable housing option. But property owners should go into this process with eyes wide open. Read the MBIE guidance carefully. Choose Licensed Building Practitioners wisely. Scrutinise the PIM and act on every issue it raises. And when in doubt, talk to your local council to ensure you understand ALL the rules - not after.

Under the new rules, granny flats may be easier to start - but they are far easier to get wrong.  

By Karel Boakes (BOINZ President)  

Beware the granny flat: the risks homeowners need to consider | The Post

The exemption applies only to a new building – what is “new”? - Paragraph

For the purposes of the granny flat exemption, “new” means a newly constructed standalone building that:

  • did not previously exist, and
  • is constructed as a separate building, rather than being created by altering, extending, or converting an existing building.

In practical terms, the exemption applies only where the building work results in a new, separate small standalone dwelling being built from scratch.

 

Is a prefabricated or transportable or relocated building “new”?

How or where the building is constructed (for example, off‑site in a factory) does not prevent it from being considered new.

A prefabricated or transportable building is considered “new” for the purposes of the granny flat exemption if:

·         the building is newly manufactured or newly constructed on or after the exemption came into force (15 January 2026), and

·         it has not previously been used or occupied, and

·         it is installed as a new standalone building on the site.

It must also meet all other Schedule 1A exemption requirements, such as:

  • comply with the NZ Building Code
  • be designed and constructed by Licensed Building Practitioners (LBP) 
  • receive a PIM before building work starts
  • have the required certification including a Certificate of Work for design work and Records of Work for all restricted building work, and safety certificates for energy work installations.

MBIE is continuing to review its guidance and policy as the exemption is implemented and beds in, and policy settings may be updated by the Government or refined over time to reflect emerging practice and lessons learned.

 

Does a PIM need to relate to the final site for a relocated building (if allowed)?

Yes. A Project Information Memorandum (PIM) must always relate to the site where the building work will be carried out.

A PIM provides information about site‑specific matters that may affect the proposed building work. For that reason, it must be issued for the land on which the building will ultimately be located.

Can a dwelling built overseas be deemed as a granny flat (work caried out overseas does not need consent)?

Currently, building work on a granny flat that is not carried out in New Zealand would need to meet the requirements of the New Zealand Building Act and Building Code when the granny flat is imported for use in New Zealand. 

For granny flats constructed offshore all the exemption conditions would apply, so the imported building would need to:

  • comply with the NZ Building Code
  • be designed and constructed by Licensed Building Practitioners (LBP) 
  • receive a PIM before building work starts
  • have the required certification including a Certificate of Work for design work and Records of Work for all restricted building work, and safety certificates for energy work installations

All other relevant exemption conditions must be met, and there is information explaining these in MBIEs guidance Granny flats exemption: Guidance and resources | Building Performance.

MBIE is continuing to review its guidance and policy as the exemption is implemented and beds in, and policy settings may be updated by the Government or refined over time to reflect emerging practice and lessons learned.

What does “associated with an existing dwelling” mean?

For the building consent exemption there is no requirement that a principal or main dwelling already exists, or the granny flat be secondary to another dwelling at the time of construction. The exemption does not depend on the order of construction (main house first vs granny flat first).

 

The phrase “associated with an existing dwelling” commonly arises from planning rules, not the Building Act. In particular under the Resource Management Act and the National Environmental Standards for Detached Minor Residential Units (NES‑DMRU), a minor residential unit is often required to be associated with an existing principal dwelling to be permitted without resource consent.  

This means a granny flat may be exempt from building consent, but still require resource consent, if planning rules are not met.

 

Can a granny flat be built on an empty section? / Is it possible for a granny flat to be built prior to the main dwelling?

Yes. However, it is important to distinguish between building consent requirements and resource consent / planning requirements:

 

Building Act 2004 (building consent exemption)
The Schedule 1A exemption does not require the granny flat to be associated with an existing dwelling at the time it is built. A granny flat may therefore be constructed first, or as the only dwelling on a site, without a building consent, provided all exemption conditions are satisfied.

 

Resource Management Act / NES‑DMRU (planning rules)
Planning rules are separate. In most cases, the National Environmental Standards for Detached Minor Residential Units (NES‑DMRU) require a minor residential unit to be associated with an existing principal dwelling in order to be permitted without resource consent. The exception to this is where a district plan would otherwise have more permissible rules (eg. would not have required a resource consent prior to the NES-DMRU coming into effect).

 

As a result, while a granny flat may be exempt from building consent on an empty section, it may still require resource consent, depending on the applicable planning framework.

 

Can a granny flat be associated with a main dwelling but on a separate section/ land title?

The Building Act does not recognise an “association” between dwellings on different titles. If a granny flat is built on a separate section, it is assessed as a standalone dwelling on that section, regardless of whether there is a main dwelling on another nearby title.

 

This is reflected in the way the exemption operates:

  • a Project Information Memorandum (PIM) must be issued for the site where the granny flat will be built, and
  • the exemption conditions, including natural hazard considerations, apply to the land the building is on, not to neighbouring or related titles.

 

It is also important to distinguish between building consent requirements and planning (resource consent) rules. The idea of a granny flat being “associated with” a main dwelling comes from planning rules (such as the NES‑DMRU), not from the Building Act. Meeting the building consent exemption does not determine whether resource consent is required.

How many granny flats can be on a site and/or section? NES-DRMU indicates one but the Building Act suggests it could be many.

Under the Building Act, there is no specified limit on the number of granny flats that can be built on a site for building consent purposes, provided that each granny flat independently meets all of the Schedule 1A exemption conditions.

 

In principle, this means more than one granny flat could be built under the building consent exemption, as long as all conditions are met for each dwelling.

 

The National Environmental Standards for Detached Minor Residential Units (NES‑DMRU) are separate from the Building Act. The NES‑DMRU generally provide for one minor residential unit per site as a permitted activity.

 

Where more than one granny flat is proposed on a site, this is likely to exceed what is permitted under the NES‑DMRU and may require resource consent, even if the granny flats meet the Building Act exemption conditions. There could also be natural hazard considerations as well depending on the nature and size of the section.

 

While aligned, the building consent exemption and planning rules operate independently. Meeting the Building Act exemption does not determine whether a proposal is permitted under the NES‑DMRU, and vice versa.

What is classed as own independent source of power?

An independent source of power means that the granny flat is supplied by a single, dedicated electricity supply arrangement for that dwelling. This ensures the granny flat can be safely supplied, isolated, and managed independently of any other dwelling on the site.

 

An independent source of power does not necessarily require a new connection from the electricity network. A granny flat may be supplied from an existing connection on the site, provided that:

  • the granny flat has its own independent switchboard and circuits, and
  • the supply is not taken from the main dwelling’s internal wiring (for example, it must not be connected via a shared household circuit or extension lead).

 

Whether an existing connection can supply both dwellings will depend on:

  • the capacity of the existing connection, and
  • compliance with the Electricity Act and associated regulations 

 

These matters are to be determined by a registered electrician and the local lines company. Upgrades may be required to ensure the supply is safe and compliant.

What are onsite effluent disposal system requirements?

Where a network wastewater system is not available or does not have sufficient capacity, a granny flat may use an onsite effluent disposal system (for example, a septic tank system), provided all exemption conditions are met.

 

For the purposes of the granny flats building consent exemption:

  • an onsite effluent disposal system must be designed, installed and operated to comply with an existing AS or VM e.g. G13/VM4, designed to AS/NZS1547:2012
  • the system must be appropriate for the site conditions and the expected loading from the granny flat e.g. 30 fixture units.
  • if an existing onsite system is proposed to be used or modified, it must have sufficient capacity and condition to service the additional dwelling. This may require a review of an existing building consent of resource consent.

 

Compliance may involve assessment against or other relevant technical standards, as appropriate.

 

Regional council rules relating to wastewater discharges to land continue to apply. The building consent exemption does not override regional plan requirements or any resource consent requirements for effluent disposal. Any separate approvals required under regional rules must still be obtained.

 

Does an onsite effluent disposal system need to be a new one or can an existing system be used or modified?

An onsite effluent disposal system does not need to be a new system. An existing onsite effluent disposal system may be used or modified, provided it can be demonstrated that the system:

  • has sufficient capacity to service the granny flat, and
  • is in a suitable condition to continue to operate effectively.

 

Under the building consent exemption, the owner is responsible for ensuring that any onsite effluent disposal system used for a granny flat complies with the Building Code. Where an existing system is relied on, the owner is responsible for obtaining appropriate professional advice or assessment to demonstrate that the system has adequate capacity and is suitable for continued use. This may include assessment against G13/VM4, AS/NZS1547:2012.

 

Because this is a building consent exemption, councils:

  • do not approve or certify onsite effluent disposal systems for granny flats, and
  • are not required to assess or verify system capacity or condition.

 

Any information prepared to demonstrate capacity and condition forms part of the owner’s due diligence and project documentation.

Regional council rules relating to wastewater discharges to land continue to apply. The building consent exemption does not override regional plan requirements or any resource consent requirements for onsite effluent disposal.

 

How can the capacity and condition of an existing onsite wastewater system be confirmed under NZS1547?

Under the granny flats building consent exemption, under G13/VM4, AS/NZS 1547:2012 is used as a recognised technical standard to assess whether an onsite wastewater system is suitable, rather than as an approval or certification process.

 

Confirming capacity and condition under AS/NZS 1547:2012 means that a suitably qualified professional assesses whether the existing onsite wastewater system:

  • Has capacity to service the additional wastewater loading from the granny flat, and
  • is in a condition that allows it to continue operating effectively.

 

The outcome of an AS/NZS1547:2012 based assessment forms part of the owner’s evidence that the exemption conditions are met and supports the owner’s obligation to ensure Building Code compliance.

 

Because this is a building consent exemption:

  • councils do not assess or certify onsite wastewater system capacity or condition under AS/NZS 1547:2012, and
  • councils may rely on the owner and their professionals to ensure appropriate assessment has been undertaken.

 

Information may be requested by a council if compliance is later questioned, or through other processes (for example, regional council requirements), but it is not a pre‑approval step under the Building Act exemption.

 

Regional council rules relating to wastewater discharges to land continue to apply. Any resource consent or discharge authorisation requirements under regional plans must still be met, regardless of the building consent exemption.

 

How can the capacity and condition of an existing onsite wastewater system be confirmed under NZS1547?

Under the granny flats building consent exemption, under G13/VM4, AS/NZS 1547:2012 is used as a recognised technical standard to assess whether an onsite wastewater system is suitable, rather than as an approval or certification process.

 

Confirming capacity and condition under AS/NZS 1547:2012 means that a suitably qualified professional assesses whether the existing onsite wastewater system:

  • Has capacity to service the additional wastewater loading from the granny flat, and
  • is in a condition that allows it to continue operating effectively.

 

The outcome of an AS/NZS1547:2012 based assessment forms part of the owner’s evidence that the exemption conditions are met and supports the owner’s obligation to ensure Building Code compliance.

Because this is a building consent exemption:

  • councils do not assess or certify onsite wastewater system capacity or condition under AS/NZS 1547:2012, and
  • councils may rely on the owner and their professionals to ensure appropriate assessment has been undertaken.

 

Information may be requested by a council if compliance is later questioned, or through other processes (for example, regional council requirements), but it is not a pre‑approval step under the Building Act exemption.

 

Regional council rules relating to wastewater discharges to land continue to apply. Any resource consent or discharge authorisation requirements under regional plans must still be met, regardless of the building consent exemption.

 

Does a BCA need to confirm regional rule requirements around discharge to ground e.g. with respect to effluent discharge, should the BCA insist on a design at application stage to show compliance?

Under the granny flats building consent exemption, BCAs are not responsible for confirming compliance with regional council discharge‑to‑ground rules.

 

Regional wastewater requirements remain the responsibility of the owner and the relevant regional council, and BCAs should not require wastewater design information as part of administering the building consent exemption.

 

A BCA may:

  • clearly advise owners that regional rules still apply, an
  • direct owners to the relevant regional council for advice on effluent discharge requirements.

What responsibility does Council have to confirm the granny flat designer is an LBP when the application is received? Applications for Granny flat exemptions are only vetted not checked by Councils so plans not drawn by an LBP would not necessarily be picked up at the time of receipt.

Submitting preliminary plans that have not been prepared by a suitably licensed designer does not in itself mean that the building work fails to qualify for the Schedule 1A exemption at the PIM stage.

 

The PIM process is a notification and information provision step, not an approval or assessment of exemption eligibility or Building Code compliance. Preliminary plans submitted with a PIM are used to help describe the proposed building work and identify relevant site information. They are not treated as the final design for the purposes of determining whether restricted design work has been lawfully carried out.

 

Design work for a granny flat will involve restricted building work, and under section 84 of the Building Act, restricted design work must be carried out or supervised by an appropriately licensed designer. If that requirement is not met by the time restricted design work is relied on for construction, the building work will not qualify for the exemption and the usual compliance and enforcement provisions of the Act may apply.

 

In practical terms, this means councils should accept and process the PIM application, clearly advise applicants of their restricted design work obligations and seek clarification where information is missing or unclear, without treating this as a refusal or eligibility decision.

 

What happens if on lodgement of the final documents it is established that the designer is not an LBP? Does that negate the whole project? (It is noted that Council does not have responsibility for checking content of the documents.)

Because councils do not check or approve design content for consent‑exempt granny flats, the issue will usually arise because the owner is unable to provide a valid Certificate of Design Work (CoW) at completion.

 

Because councils do not check or approve design content for consent‑exempt granny flats, the issue will usually arise because the owner is unable to provide a valid Certificate of Design Work (CoW) at completion.

 

Under the granny flats building consent exemption:

  1. restricted design work must be carried out or supervised by an appropriately licensed person (for example, an LBP (Design), Registered Architect, or CPEng).
  2. evidence of this is provided through a Certificate of Design Work on completion
  3. the owner must provide all required completion documentation to the council within 20 working days of completion. This includes a Certificate of Design Work for restricted design work

 

If the designer is not an LBP (or equivalent), the owner:

  • cannot obtain a valid Certificate of Design Work, and
  • cannot meet the documentation requirements of the exemption.

 

Without a valid Certificate of Design Work a mandatory exemption condition is not met, the building work cannot be treated as having been completed under the Schedule 1A exemption and an alternative compliance pathway is required for example a Certificate of Acceptance.

Can a definition of what constitutes light timber or steel framing be provided?

For the purposes of the granny flats building consent exemption (Schedule 1A), light timber or light steel framing refers to a structural framing system where the primary load bearing structure is made of lightweight timber or cold formed steel members, consistent with typical low rise residential construction in New Zealand.

Light timber framed buildings are commonly designed and detailed in accordance with NZS 3604, or to an equivalent engineered solution that still uses a light timber framing system as the primary structure.

Light steel framing generally means cold formed light gauge steel framing, and wall, floor and roof framing systems consistent with standards such as the NASH Light Steel Framed Buildings Standard.

Can other Building Act exemptions also apply to a granny flat?

Other Schedule 1 building consent exemptions do not apply to the construction of a granny flat. A granny flat must be built entirely under Schedule 1A or under a building consent. 

Once a granny flat has been lawfully completed, Schedule 1 exemptions may apply to future work in the same way as for any other dwelling.

 

At what stage, if any, can additional building work be undertaken that does not require a building consent (for example, decks or verandas), and must such work only occur after the granny flat has been completed and confirmed as lawfully established under Schedule 1A?

A granny flat must be constructed to comply fully with the requirements of Schedule 1A of the Building Act 2004, or a building consent is required. 


Other work that is exempt under Schedule 1 or carried out under a building consent that does not comply with the conditions of schedule 1A should not modify any part of the granny flat itself before it is completed.


Schedule 1 exemptions may still apply to other, separate building work on the site, provided the relevant exemption criteria are met and the work does not affect the granny flat’s compliance with the exemption conditions and/ or Building Code compliance.
 
Three common scenarios explaining how this would work and be permissible in practice:
 
1.    The granny flat is deemed complete (as set out in section 42B) and meets all Schedule 1A conditions. After completion, a deck is built on the granny flat and it independently meets the Schedule 1 exemption criteria.
2.    The deck is built at the same time as the granny flat and forms part of or is integrated with the dwelling and both the deck and granny flat meet all Schedule 1A conditions.
3.    The granny flat is being built and meets all Schedule 1A conditions. The deck is built at the same time and is physically and functionally separate from the granny flat (by the 2m minimum separation) and independently meets the Schedule 1 exemption criteria.

What should a BCA do  when it sees obvious noncompliance to Building Act Schedule 1A ( 2) Requirements for a small standalone dwelling (e.g. no light timber/steel framed is 6m high or has a ground level over 1m)?

Where a BCA identifies building work that is clearly outside the scope of Schedule 1A (for example, the dwelling is not lightweight timber or steel framed, exceeds the permitted height, or has a finished floor level more than 1 metre above ground), the matter should be treated in the same way as any other building work being carried out without a required building consent.

The exemption does not create a separate or alternative compliance regime. Once it is clear that the Schedule 1A conditions are not met, the project simply falls back into the standard regulatory framework under the Building Act.

Responsibility for ensuring eligibility for the exemption rests with the owner and their engaged building professionals, not with the council.

How should changes to the design of a granny flat that occur during the build, be treated?

Any change to the design must be considered against the Schedule 1A conditions and the Building Code. Even minor changes can affect eligibility for the exemption. If a change means the building work no longer meets the Schedule 1A requirements, the exemption no longer applies and building work must stop until a building consent is obtained. 

Changes that do not affect eligibility for the exemption should be managed through standard design and construction practice. Licensed building professionals remain responsible for ensuring that:
•    the building continues to comply with the Building Code, and
•    the work remains within the scope of Schedule 1A.

All design changes made during construction must be fully and accurately documented, including:
•    updating plans and specifications to reflect what is actually built
•    issuing updated Certificates of Design Work (CoDW) where                   restricted building work design has changed
•    ensuring Records of Work (RoW) clearly reflect the work carried out or supervised.

At completion, the final design plans provided to the owner and council must show the as built outcome, including all variations made during construction. These documents form part of the permanent property record and may be relied on for future alterations, compliance, insurance or sale of the property.

 

How should additional building work done on the site be treated if the granny flat is incomplete? 

A PIM will automatically lapse if the building work is not completed within two years of the PIM being issued. To avoid this, a homeowner must apply to the council for an extension before the two-year deadline. 

If the granny flat is not completed and the PIM lapses, the granny flats exemption no longer applies. 

If the PIM lapses before the granny flat is complete the homeowner may need to apply for a certificate of acceptance for building work already completed and/or building consent to obtain regulatory approval for the remaining building work.

 

Is it appropriate to accept and process building consent applications for work outside the granny flat exemption prior to final confirmation that the granny flat has been lawfully established? 

Whether it is appropriate to accept and process a building consent application for work outside the granny flat exemption before final confirmation that the granny flat has been lawfully established is ultimately a matter for each council to determine, based on its own systems and operational practices. A PIM will automatically lapse if the building work is not completed within two years of the PIM being issued. To avoid this, the homeowner must apply to the council for an extension before the two-year deadline.

However, a granny flat built under the Schedule 1A building consent exemption must be completed in accordance with all exemption conditions before it is treated as a lawfully established dwelling. The exemption applies to the entire dwelling as a whole, and compliance must be maintained throughout construction. Building work that is intended to be carried out under a building consent and that forms part of, modifies, or relies on the granny flat itself should not begin until the granny flat has been completed under the exemption. This avoids overlap between exemption and consent pathways.

Councils may choose to accept and process a building consent application in advance (for example, for future work) or defer processing until the granny flat has been confirmed as complete, provided that no consented work affecting the granny flat itself is carried out until the exemption pathway has been properly completed.

The timing that matters is when consented building work begins, rather than when the application is processed.

 

Would accepting an application for other building work on the same site as an incomplete granny flat undermine reliance on the exemption provisions or create unintended compliance or enforcement risk for Council?

See answer above.

 

How will future alterations to a granny flat be treated?

Once a granny flat has been lawfully completed under the Schedule 1A building consent exemption, it is treated as a lawful existing dwelling for the purposes of the Building Act.
After completion:
•    the granny flat is no longer assessed under Schedule 1A, and
•    future building work is assessed in the same way as for any other         existing dwelling.
This means that any later alterations, additions, or upgrades must follow the appropriate regulatory pathway based on the nature of the proposed building work.

Is there anything to stop a 3-level granny flat being built 2m from the front boundary with a building consent? To help clarify this and provide some context around the reason for asking, I’ve received the following additional explanation:

The NES does not specify the 1 level requirement just that it must be less than 70m2. The building act exemption does say one level so would not fit this criteria but if you obtain a BC then you can legally build 2m from the front or side boundary 2 or even 3 storey’s high and be legally complaint with the planning rules. Issues around sunlight protection for neighbours etc. The NES and Building Act exemptions are not linked in any way, you can use each one separately.

 

The Building Act does not prevent a two or three storey dwelling being built close to a boundary where a building consent is obtained and the proposal complies with the Building Code and the applicable planning rules.

The granny flat building consent exemption (Schedule 1A) applies only to a narrow set of buildings, including a requirement that the dwelling is single storey. A building that does not meet those conditions cannot use the exemption and must instead be built under a building consent.
Once a building consent is used, the Schedule 1A design limits no longer apply. Building height, number of storeys, and setbacks are then managed through:
•    the Building Code (building performance and safety), and
•    the planning framework (NES DMRU, district plan rules, or a resource consent where required).

The NES DMRU and the Building Act exemption operate independently. Meeting (or not meeting) one does not determine whether the other applies.

 

 

Discretionary Exemption

This exemption allows territorial authorities to use their discretion to exempt any proposed building work if it complies with the Building Code and is unlikely to endanger people or buildings.

From 31 August 2020, some building projects no longer need a building consent, making it faster and easier for people to turn their building dreams into a reality.

These are the types of building projects that may no longer require a building consent:

  • SOME single-storey detached buildings such as sleepouts, sheds and greenhouses up to 30 square metres (see 'Sleepouts' and 'Accessory Buildings'). 
  • Carports (up to 40 square metres )
  • Ground floor awnings, verandas and porches (up to 30 square metres).
  • Repairing and replacing some existing building elements. 

Solar panel arrays, permanent outdoor fireplaces or ovens, water storage bladders for irrigation and firefighting purposes, short-span small bridges, hay barns and pole sheds are also included.

Even though these building projects may not need a building consent, all work must meet the Building Code and some work requires a professional. Some projects also require Resource Consent (see 'Resource Consents' tab in the side bar). It's important that homeowners know there are still rules that need to be followed.

You're responsible for your building projects.

If you own the property, you own the responsibility. This means you must check whether your building project requires a Building Consent or Resource Consent.

All the information you need to make your decision is available at https://www.building.govt.nz/buildit

Not where an internal wall is acting as an integral part of the building as a structural unit or as a bracing unit. A building owner should take professional advice as to whether such a wall is structural or not.

Generally speaking a building consent is not required where a building component is replaced with a similar building component. However there is an exception to this where a building component fails to meet the durability requirements of the New Zealand Building Code. In such a case a building consent would be required. Any change in the cladding to a dissimilar material would need to be the subject of a building consent.

Irrespective of whether a building consent is needed or not any building work must comply with the New Zealand Building Code.

Yes.

 

 

Compliance Schedules

The compliance schedule lists the building’s specified systems and the inspection, maintenance and reporting procedures needed to keep them in good order.

Purpose of this guidance information
The purpose of this guidance information is to help building owners and managers of commercial, industrial or communal (public use) buildings understand their responsibilities under the Building Act 2004 as they relate to compliance schedules and building warrants of fitness.

Residential properties do not require a compliance schedule, unless it has a cable car installed.

Legislative requirements
The Building Act 2004 (the Act) outlines Council’s responsibilities in respect to enforcing the provisions of the Act and promoting and protecting the public’s health and safety. Council’s role is to educate, monitor and work with building owners, managers and independent qualified persons (IQPs) to ensure that the purposes and principles of the Act are achieved.

What is a compliance schedule?
A compliance schedule is an inventory or list of specified systems, contained within a building and states the performance standards which must be met:
•    Inspection, testing, maintenance and reporting procedures
•    The frequency of inspections, and
•    Who should perform those inspections

What is a Specified system?
A specified system is a system or feature that is contained within a building for the primary purpose of maintaining health or life safety of building users i.e. fire alarm, sprinkler, mechanical ventilation system, etc.

Requirements for specified systems are set out in the 1st Schedule of the 2005/032 Building (Specified Systems, Change the Use, and Earthquake-Prone Buildings) Regulations 2005. Where one or more of these systems exist in a building, a compliance schedule is required. 

Please refer to the Specified Systems Guidance document attached to assist when applying for your Building Consent.

What is a performance standard?
The level of performance a specified system is intended to meet, and continue to meet, at the time it was designed and installed in a building. 

Compliance with the Building Code is normally achieved by referring to an acceptable solution or a verification method. For example, the performance standard for sprinkler systems is NZS 4541:2013. This standard specifies what the maintenance, inspection and reporting regime is for sprinkler systems. 

When is a compliance schedule issued?
A compliance schedule is issued at the same time as the code compliance certificate, along with a compliance schedule statement. 
The compliance schedule is issued by Council, when it is satisfied that all specified systems are operational.

How do I apply for a compliance schedule?
Information relating to specified systems is usually submitted as part of your Form 2 Application for a Building Consent. Documentation must accompany the application, identifying the type of system being installed.

Documentation must state what type of specified system is being installed; where the system is located; and the name and year of the performance standard that the system will be maintained, inspected and reported against. Specified Systems Guidance 

It is recommended that drawing(s) are provided on project completion showing the general location of all specified systems contained within the building. This ensures that a correct and accurate record exists and assists the IQP to determine whether all features have been properly inspected, maintained.

What is a compliance schedule statement?
When the compliance schedule is issued, a compliance schedule statement is also issued. The compliance schedule statement must be kept and displayed in a public/visible location such as the lobby or reception area of the building. Council must agree to the location of the statement. The compliance schedule statement states the specified system(s) on the compliance schedule and where the compliance schedule is kept.

The compliance schedule statement is valid for the first year and must be replaced by a Building Warrant of Fitness (BWOF) on, or before the anniversary date of the issue of the compliance schedule.

If an interim compliance schedule is issued, this will be replaced by a final compliance schedule when the building work is complete and the CCC is issued. However, the compliance schedule is effective from the date that the interim compliance schedule was issued, (i.e. if an interim compliance schedule was issued with a CPU, the date of the compliance schedule that is attached to the CCC will be the same as the date of the (CPU) as systems will already have commenced their maintenance, inspection and reporting regimes.

The compliance schedule statement is issued by Council.

Can I have more than one compliance schedule for multiple tenancies?
Yes, where a building consent application relates to multiple tenancies, which comprises several blocks of shops or units, it may be more appropriate to issue one compliance schedule for each block of shops / units, within the complex. For this scenario to apply, it will depend on the extent and scope of the specified systems installed e.g. if there is one sprinkler system or one alarm system that spans multiple tenancies, a single compliance schedule can be issued for that particular block.

Where there are multiple tenancies, the applicant should advise the preferred option so that compliance schedules can be prepared accordingly. Where multiple compliance schedules are prepared, each one must have its own unique number.

Specified Systems Guidance Document for Customers 

Where a premises has an existing Compliance Schedule and a change needs to be made to the Schedule because of building work undertaken or changes to the way the building is used, it is likely that a change could be required to the Compliance Schedule.

 

 

Building Warrant of Fitness (BWOF)

A BWoF (Building Warrant of Fitness) is an annual certificate required in New Zealand confirming that a commercial or public building’s safety systems have been inspected and maintained. 

What is a Building Warrant of Fitness (BWOF)?
A Building Warrant of Fitness (BWOF) is a certificate issued by the building owner confirming that all of the specified systems contained within the building have been inspected and maintained and are 
performing in accordance with the compliance schedule. A BWOF verifies that the inspection, maintenance and reporting procedures for all the specified systems within a building have been carried out in accordance with the compliance schedule for the previous 12 months.

 

Who is responsible for issuing the Building Warrant of Fitness (BWOF)?
Issuing of the BWOF certificate is the owner’s responsibility; this document must be issued annually. 

The owner is required to display a copy of the BWOF certificate in a visible location in the building where it can be seen and to which the public have access.

In summary every year the building owner is required to:
•   Issue a BWOF
•   Display a copy of the BWOF certificate (Form 12) in a visible location
•   Provide Council with a copy of the BWOF and IQP Certificates (Form 12A)

 

How is the Building Warrant of Fitness (BWOF) issued?
The building owner or the owner’s agent issues a Building Warrant of Fitness (BWOF) on a Form 12 prescribed by Building Forms Regulations 2004. A BWOF certificate is issued for a 12-month period, which coincides with the date that the compliance schedule was issued. 

The BWOF is required to:

  • State that the requirements of the compliance schedule have been satisfied
  • State that the requirements of the compliance schedule have been satisfied
  • Be signed by the building owner or their agent
  • State where the compliance schedule and any associated certificates or reports (Form 12a) will be located

The building owner must attach copies of all Form 12a certificates together with any recommendations and forward these to the Council. 

 

What is a Form 12a certificate?
This is the certificate issued by the independent qualified person (IQP) verifying that the inspection, maintenance and reporting procedures set out on the compliance schedule have been undertaken. The IQP must attach to this form any other supporting documentation confirming compliance i.e. such as certificates of compliance, certificates of completion or producer statements for construction and 
construction review.

It is recommended that drawing(s) are provided on project completion showing the general location of all of the specified systems contained in the building. This ensures that a correct and accurate record exists for all systems and assists IQPs to determine whether all features have been properly inspected, maintained and reported on.

 

Who or what is an IQP?
This is a person identified by the Council as being a person qualified to carry out any performance inspection, maintenance and reporting on a particular system or feature. IQPs (or IQP compliance companies) are employed by the building owner but must have the approval of the Council to undertake the work. 

The Council will assess the IQP to ascertain that they are appropriately qualified to undertake the work performed. (A fee may be charged for this assessment). ‘Independent’ means that the IQP has no financial interest in the building that they are auditing.

 

Getting professional help
You cannot issue a BWOF certificate without getting the necessary checks completed and obtaining a certificate (known as a Form 12A) signed off. You can use an IQP compliance company to act as your agent to help sort out all the paperwork. They can co-ordinate all specialist IQP inspections required for each of the specified systems in your building, collect the paperwork and issue the BWOF as well as deal with the Council for you.

 

Tenants and the owner
The building owner’s responsibilities are clear, whether or not the building is tenanted. A building owner may delegate his / her responsibility to a tenant. But this does not alleviate the owner from liability if the tenant fails to fulfil obligations. A building owner or anyone acting on the building owner’s behalf in signing a BWOF may be liable if they make a false or misleading statement in the BWOF.

 

Council inspections/BWOF Audits
The territorial authority is required to inspect a building and the specified systems in the building and may charge a fee (section 111).

Inspection means the taking of all reasonable steps to ensure that:
•    An annual BWOF supplied under section 108 is correct; and
•    Every report under section 110 is correct

 

Penalties
The Building Act 2004 contains a number of provisions to protect public health and safety that are important for building owners and managers. There is a range of penalties for failing to comply with these provisions:

  • If a person is the owner of a building for which a compliance schedule has been obtained, they are liable for a fine of up to $20,000 with a further fine of $2,000 for each day the offence is continued
  • Building owners can be fined up to $20,000 for failing to display a Building Warrant of Fitness, or displaying a false or misleading Building Warrant of Fitness;
  • Building owners who fail to give written notice of a change of use commit an offence and are liable to a maximum fine of $5,000;
  • It is also an offence carrying a fine of up to $100,000 to use or permit the use of a building, which is not safe or sanitary, or if it has inadequate means of escape from fire.

The following forms apply to the Compliance Schedule and

Building Warrant of Fitness regime

Form 10

Compliance schedule statement form (issued by territorial authority)

Form 11

Application to amend a compliance schedule

Form 12

Building Warrant of Fitness (issued by owner or owner’s agent)

Form 12a

Certificate of compliance with inspection, maintenance and reporting procedures (issued by IQP)

Forms 11 and 12 contain requirements to state the buildings current lawfully established use and the building occupant load. This information may be sourced from the building consent application form held by Council. Note the description of the building use should be clearly stated. For example: an office building containing retail space should be called “office and retail” not commercial.

 

Non-testable backflow prevention devices
Non-testable backflow devices must be included in the compliance schedule; the testing and reporting regime should reflect the type of device installed

  • There is a verification test in G12/AS1 for atmospheric vacuum breakers;
  • Other non-testable backflow devices such as dual check valve assemblies should have an appropriate visual inspection and be replaced every two years

A building warrant of fitness (BWoF) is a building owner’s annual statement confirming the specified systems in the compliance schedule for their building have been maintained and checked for the previous 12 months, in accordance with the compliance schedule.

Owners of commercial, industrial or communal (public use) buildings are responsible for making sure that their building is safe for people to enter, occupy and work in. This is through the building warrant of fitness (BWoF) system and applies to all buildings with a compliance schedule (CS).


For an overview of your compliance responsibilities and how to meet these see Guidance on Building Warrant of Fitness and Compliance Schedules 

Application for amending a Compliance Schedule - Form 11 

Building Warrant of Fitness - Form 12 

An IQP (Independently Qualified Person) is terminology that was found in the Building Act 1991.

An IQP has specialist qualifications for dealing with or issuing building warrants of fitness and thus confirming that buildings used by the public and buildings that have safety systems are compliant at all times.

 

 

Notice to Fix Information and Guidance

A notice to fix is a statutory notice requiring a person to remedy a breach of the Building Act 2004 or regulations under that Act. A notice to fix can be issued for all breaches of the Act, not just for building work.

What is a Notice to Fix

A notice to fix (NTF) is a statutory notice requiring a person to remedy a breach of the Building Act 2004 or regulations under that Act. A notice to fix can be issued for all breaches of the Act, not just for building work.

 

Issuing of a notice to fix

A notice to fix is issued by a building consent authority or a territorial authority.

They’re issued to a specified person, the building owner, and where applicable

  • the person carrying out building work
  • any other person supervising that building work.

A notice to fix must be issued where we, as the authority, believe on reasonable grounds that

  • a specified person is working outside of the Building Act 2004 (for example, doing building work without a building consent, or not following the building consent)
  • a specified person is disregarding any of the Building Regulations under the 2004 Act (including the Building Regulations 1992, containing the Building Code)
  • a building warrant of fitness is not correct
  • the inspection, maintenance or reporting procedures stated in the compliance schedule aren’t or haven’t been complied with.

We have some discretion as to what to include in notices to fix and use this to make sure a notice to fix is appropriate to the circumstances of a particular situation.

 

What to do if you receive a notice to fix

If you receive a notice to fix

  • read the details of the notice and ensure you understand your options to achieve compliance and the timeframe in which to do this
  • you may need a building consent to complete remedial work
  • keep council informed of how you’ll comply and when any remedial works will be carried out
  • don’t do any other work until you have fixed the non-compliances and the council has lifted the notice
  • if in doubt on any of the details contact us to discuss further.

Once the notice to fix has been complied with we’ll provide written confirmation to you (and the building owner if not you) that the notice to fix has been complied with and lifted.

If you don’t comply with the notice to fix within the stated timeframe this can result in

  • further notices to fix being issued, or
  • the possibility of an infringement notice and associated fee, and
  • ultimately can lead to prosecution under the Building Act 2004.

Fines on conviction can be up to $20,000. Where it is a continuing offence, further fines of up to $20,000 for every day or part of a day during which the office has continued.

 

 

Certificate of Acceptance (CoA)

A Certificate of Acceptance may be issued by the Council for work that requires a building consent, but has been completed without one

Where work has been undertaken without a Building Consent having been granted and certification is required as to the apparent standard of the work, application can be made for a Certificate of Acceptance. It is likely that a Certificate of Acceptance would be associated with other legal proceedings relating to the unlawful building work. It may be necessary for you take legal advice. These applications should be submitted through the online portal.

All applications MUST be accompanied with detailed plans, including site plan, floor plan, elevations, cross sections etc and supporting information including, bracing details, engineer details (if any), ground bearing report, specifications, truss certificates and any other information to support your application. If these details are not provided your application may be rejected.

 

 

Certificate of Public Use (CPU)

A CPU is the assurance that a building (or part of a building) is safe for the public to use while the building is undergoing building work that involves a building consent, but for which as yet there is no Code Compliance Certificate (CCC).

If the public uses all or part of your building, and you want them to access it before your building work has been signed off as complete, you can apply to the council for a certificate for public use. Your application will need to show that all or part of the building (whatever you are applying for) can be used safely by members of the public.

If you don't have a certificate for public use, you could be fined up to $200,000 and fined up to a further $20,000 for every day or part of a day the offence continues.

You can only apply for a certificate for public use if a building consent has been granted but the code compliance certificate has not been issued. You will still need to apply for a code compliance certificate once the building work has been completed.

See MBIE guidance at "Public access while building or altering a public building".

Please return the completed CPU application form to  buildingadmin@westlanddc.govt.nz or post to Private Bag 704, Hokitika 7842 or deliver in-person to 36 Weld Street, Hokitika.

Please do not email or attach the application to the Building Consent via Objective Build. CPU's follow a different operational process and sending it to the consent might cause unnecessary delays.

 

 

Other Information and Guidance

From 1st January 2017, pools are required to meet the Building (Pools) Amendment Act 2016. Replacing the Fencing and Swimming Pools Act 1987.

Pool safety barriers are now regulated by the Building Act 2004, under provisions of Clause F9 of the New Zealand Building Code (Building Regulations). Swimming and paddling pools over 40cm deep require a  pool fence, which needs building consent to comply with the Act. Pools over 35,000 L capacity require a building consent.

Gates or doors entering the immediate pool area must have self-closure devices, and only pool related equipment should be in the enclosure - so a fence around the whole garden does not comply. 

Key changes include:

  • Residential swimming pools must be inspected every three years
  • Safety covers will be able to be used as barriers for spa pools and hot tubs
  • Territorial authorities will have better tools to enforce pool barrier requirements, including notices to fix and infringement notices.
  • The Amendment Act created new Building Code clause F9.
  • The Building (Pools) Regulations 2016 sets out the fees payable by independently qualified pool inspectors, and the certificate they will issue if a pool has compliant barriers.
  • The Building (Pool Manufacturers and Retailers) notice in the New Zealand Gazette sets out the requirements for notices that manufacturers and retailers must supply with pools from 1 September 2017.

You can read more about restricting access to residential pools on the Building Performance website

Swimming Pool barriers and fences require Building Consent. 

Please refer to the Safety guidance and the Pool Safety Checklist for further details.

New Zealand is extremely prone to seismic activity and ensuring the safety of people is paramount. Commercial buildings need to be safe for occupants and users. Some of these buildings may be Earthquake-Prone, that is, under 35% of the standard of a new building (NBS).

The Building (Earthquake-prone Buildings) Amendment Act 2016 came into force on 1 July 2017. It categorises New Zealand into three seismic risk areas and sets time frames for identifying and taking action to strengthen or remove earthquake-prone buildings. 

Westland District Council as a Territorial Authority has the role of identifying these buildings, assigning them ratings and issuing notices based on engineer's reports, and publishing the information in the public register. The Council also encourages owners of EQP buildings to take action to make them safe. 

You can view the national register of buildings that are Earthquake-Prone here: Register of earthquake-prone buildings 

If you are the owner of a commercial or public building, there is very good guidance on MBIE's website: Managing earthquake-prone buildings 

If you think your building may need to be assessed for seismic risk, you can View MBIE's Seismic Risk Guidance for Buildings

Proposed Changes to the Earthquake-Prone Building System

The Government is proposing legislative changes aimed at making the EPB system more proportionate and cost-effective by focusing on higher seismic risk areas and high-risk building types. A bill containing the proposed changes is expected to be introduced in coming months.

The changes are designed to target buildings that pose the greatest risk to life safety, while reducing unnecessary costs and disruption, particularly in regional communities.

By enabling more cost-effective approaches to seismic strengthening, remediation will be more accessible for building owners than under the previous regime.

The proposed changes include:

  • removing low risk buildings and buildings in low seismic zones (Auckland, Northland and the Chatham Islands) from the EPB system
  • introducing tiered risk mitigation requirements, making use of new engineering methodologies, based on location and building type
  • allowing building owners to apply for deadline extensions, to encourage incremental progress
  • reducing barriers to seismic strengthening by removing the requirement for concurrent fire and accessibility upgrades.

These changes mean that:

  • around 55% of EPBs (around 2,900 buildings) will be removed from the EPB system
  • around 1,440 will have more affordable remediation requirements
  • 840 EPBs will have no mandatory requirement for remedial work, and
  • only around 80 buildings will require a full retrofit due to the risk they pose.

Cabinet paper, reports, and supporting analyses

The form is required to be completed for a request for waiver or modification in respect of Compliance with Building Code Clause B2 Durability on a Code Compliance Certificate. This form must be completed by the owner or agent.

 

 

Frequently asked Questions

A Project Information Memorandum provides a comprehensive analysis of the Council’s rules and requirements relating to a proposed building project.

A PIM does not allow any building to commence and is a precursor to a building consent. Large developments will, most likely, commence with a PIM so that specific issues relating to the location of the building on a site, car parking, servicing, bulk and location, footpaths and roading can be stated prior to the preparation of final plans. It will also provide information relating to snow loadings and earthquake and corrosion zones which are vital to the design structure of all buildings. Generally speaking, a PIM is not used for smaller building projects.

In accordance with the New Zealand Building Act 2004 all applications for Project Information Memorandum must be accompanied by any fees and charges imposed by the TA.  You will receive an invoice in due course, or you are welcome to deposit $747 for Residential PIMs, or $997 for commercial.  This includes time for processing and any un used portion of processing will be refunded to you, or any additional processing will be invoiced to you. Once payment is made, processing of the PIM well begin.

From 1st January 2017, pools are required to meet the Building (Pools) Amendment Act 2016.

Pool safety barriers are now regulated by the Building Act 2004, under provisions of Clause F9 of the New Zealand Building Code (Building Regulations)

Please refer to the legislation and check with your local council for full details.

Swimming Pools and Spas Pools require a building consent to install. This will require a pool fence to comply with the Act. "Pools" are all pools that have the capability of water depth greater than 400 mm

Gates or doors entering the immediate pool area must have self closure devices.

Please refer to the Pool Safety Checklist for further details.

A building consent will be required for the placement of a container on a site under certain circumstances. Such circumstances will principally depend on the proposed use of the container, the site, and the length and duration of the proposal.

Building Consent Authority staff will assist with specific enquiries.

The Government, through the Ministry for the Environment, has introduced a National Environment Standard for woodburners. The National Environmental Standard for air quality includes a design standard for woodburners in urban areas. The woodburner standard applies only in urban areas and where the allotment containing the building is less than two hectares in area. The standards do not apply to multifuel or coal burners or appliances for cooking; just wood burners.

Building owners can find out which burners are “approved” by visiting the Ministry for the Environment website or discussing proposed installations with the Building Consent Authority Staff.

Depending on whether your structure is a vehicle or a building you may have to apply for a building consent.

Just because a structure has some vehicle-like features, such as wheels, doesn’t necessarily make it a vehicle under the Building Act. The distinction between a building that is movable, and a vehicle, is that a vehicle is used for transporting people or goods, or must be powered by some form of combustion or self-propelled.

If you are considering putting a structure on your property you should seek professional guidance, and consult with council and the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment website.

The Building (Earthquake-prone Buildings) Amendment Act 2016 (the Act) came into force on 1 July 2017. It contains major changes to the current system of identifying and remediating earthquake-prone buildings under the Building Act 2004, including a new national system for building identification and assessment and a publicly available national register of buildings that are earthquake-prone.